“Your
word (Torah) is truth.”
Due to the present inexistence of the Temple , Biblical texts on offerings or about
the Yom HaKippurim rituals in Leviticus 16 may
today seem irrelevant. They may feel to us like texts pertaining to a distant
people and past, and as having very little to offer us today. As we wonder in
this train of thought, we must remember the words of King David, "The
Torah of God is perfect, pure and eternal" (Psalms 19. If these things are
part of the divine oracle, they certainly have perpetual pertinence.
There are some who teach that Yeshua initiated a new Temple -less era. This is
strange when apostolic texts as well as historical books pertaining to
fist-century life in Israel tell
us that for forty years after the resurrection of the Master, that is until the
roman invasion of Jerusalem , the Jewish
disciples of Messiah continued Temple
and synagogue attendance as a sect of Judaism. They continued in the Passover
traditions, as well as in those pertaining to the atonement rituals of Yom
Kippur. If they found relevancy in doing so, shouldn't we? Is there then something
that we are missing and should learn from these long descriptions in Leviticus?
Stepping aside a little from the realm of the ritual and entering that of the
social, much indeed should be learned from Temple and offering protocols.
Here are some examples. The Torah acknowledges that appointed
judges can sometimes err in judgment and therefore cause the people to sin. In
such a case, a public admission of error is required through an offering
(Leviticus 4:13). I am thinking right now of the court which wrongfully
condemned our Master. There is a provision for them to eventually confess and
publicly acknowledge their error thus atoning for the sin of the people of
their day. We also learn that Hashem understands our financial pressures and
makes provisions for cheaper offerings to be made (Leviticus 5:1–11). Also,
though Hashem understands involuntary mistakes, they still require
acknowledgment and retribution. In our system, the punishment for a thief is
incarceration. The Torah is concerned with retribution and as such a thief is
required to restore that which he had gotten deceitfully, plus a fifth to the
person he stole it from. He is also supposed to make amends with God for
breaking his commands.
The offering process is also quite interesting. The person comes
to the altar and with his hand on the forehead of the animal to be offered confesses
his sins to Hashem, (not to the priest). Doing so, he in fact transfers his
sinful identity on the poor animal. Then, except in the case of a bird
offering, the offerer is the one who has to kill the animal, hear it die, get
splattered with its fluids, and feel its life’s warm blood run through his
hands. Along with having to pay for a good quality animal, one of the best of
the flock, this becomes to him a very good illustration of the horribleness and
cost of disobedience and sin, which should provoke in him a healthy fear of
Hashem.
This makes me wonder: Christianity at large claims a theology that
affirms they are no more sinners and as a result they invalidate the Torah. When
the their sinful reality dawns on them they realize that they need rules, a social
structure, moral guidance, and a penal system. This leas them to institute
their own sense of law and righteousness. The question is: Why didn’t they keep
God’s system in the first place?
P. Gabriel Lumbroso
For P. Gabriel Lumbroso's devotional UNDER THE FIG TREE in Kindle edition click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment